By Margarete Boos, Michaela Kolbe, Peter M. Kappeler, Thomas Ellwart
Coordination in Human and Primate teams provides one of many first collections of different ways and strategies used to evaluate coordination techniques in teams. Written by way of psychologists and primatologists, the e-book represents a large diversity of coordination study fields reminiscent of social psychology, paintings and organizational psychology, drugs, primatology, and behavioural ecology. it really is designed for researchers and practitioners attracted to realizing the behavioural features of workforce coordination.
Read Online or Download Coordination in Human and Primate Groups PDF
Best child psychology books
Applies the idea that of private and political autonomy to young children and kid's improvement.
This booklet offers a scientific account of parental behaviour and the technique of picking and addressing insufficient parenting. it's meant for pros who paintings with young children or adults who have been harmed as childrens, and its critical situation is with mom and dad who endanger their young ones or whose teenagers might endanger themselves or others.
There's a enormous quantity of curiosity inside of pediatrics and pri mary health and wellbeing care that's at present being directed towards the behavioral and emotional difficulties of early life. routinely, those parts were emphasised by way of baby psychiatrists, baby psychologists, and psy chiatric social staff.
This selection of papers from psychoanalysts throughout Europe is meant to focus on the similarites and adjustments among methods to operating with young ones and youngsters.
Additional info for Coordination in Human and Primate Groups
Fichtel (*), L. M. de M. Boos et al. 1007/978-3-642-15355-6_3, # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011 37 38 C. Fichtel et al. predation risk, joint resource defence, cooperative foraging, shared vigilance, and information transfer (Alexander 1974; Bertram 1978). Living in a group also leads to interindividual conflicts and costs, such as competition over resources and mates, as well as increased pathogen transmission. These factors limit the size of groups and act as a centrifugal force on group cohesion (Alexander 1974; Bertram 1978).
That means that the group should first of all produce and differentiate a large number of design ideas in order to develop a comprehensive problem view. This differentiation has to be reduced during group interaction if the group is ever to reach a final design proposal. For that purpose, increased activity towards the integration of concepts must occur. This pattern of first divergent processes (differentiation of ideas) followed by convergent processes (integration of ideas and concepts) is typical for design processes (Boos 2006b).
Cannon-Bowers and Salas 1998; Cannon-Bowers et al. 1993; Klimoski and Mohammed 1994). A large portion of the challenge of achieving shared mental models is maximising the extent of explicitness in the consensus regarding meanings (for additional details regarding the importance of explicitness concerning meanings, see Chap. 11). 1). Implicit or tacit assumptions regarding terminology are particularly disruptive to joint research efforts, as was alluded to earlier in this section regarding our interdisciplinary project.